Who invented ethos logos and pathos

Related Content. April 20, by Rachel Harner. If the audience really trusts your, then they expect that you are telling the truth. We measure the ethos of a speaker in four main characteristics: similarity, trustworthiness, authority, and expertise. You audience must be able to view you as a credible source before they accept anything you say. Would a candy ad for today ever have this much text? Figure 8. The rhetorical triangle [Image Description].

If your Powerpoint presentation is boring, you can think about how pathos could be used to help your audience take your message seriously. Identify how others are trying to persuade us: Ethos, pathos and logos can be useful tools for information literacy. Is it all pathos with very few facts to back it up?

But in the end, a great speech has a mix of all three. An interesting and important introduction to making persuasive presentations. U L Mehta. I really liked the article. This is a very interesting article. I really agree with those three points. I use a website called Present. Me to help me with those qualities when public speaking. It allows you to attach a video of yourself presenting to your Powerpoint slides. Not only does it mean you can send a present.

Hope this helps. I think, that all 3 rubrics are very important. Ethos is very improtant, because if you cant trust the speeker or cant find a connection with, you probably will not give enough attention to the whole speech.

Next; Pathos. What is a part of Ethos to give your speech more expression. Last but not least; Logos. To deliver a speech that makes sense and everyone can understand. Student at NVCC public speaking. I personally think a speech that has a logical base with an emotional appeal. An audience can connect better with someones emotions but it must have logic behind it so it can be a good argument or speech.

If the audience just hears a speech with ethos it can become boring and hard to connect to. I had very little knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos prior to taking this class. I believe that is it very importan to have all three ethos, pathos, and logos while giving a speech on pursuasion. I also think that pathos is the most important because many people go on an emotional stand.

To persude someone, it is necessary to have all three present. It is absolutely amazing that this theroy came in ancient greek from Aristotle. It is the basis to writing a persuasion speech. Also, about the question that you had that which one is important I can tell that Logos is the answer as Aristotle said. I think Logic can be understood very early by the audience. The best way to prove logic to the audience can be giving some examples to clear everything for them.

Although,Pathos is the one that I think should be the second important one after Logos because by the emotion that speaker gives to the audience he can be much effective on them. From my prior knowledge, I know that Aristotle taught the youth to do public speaking which was looked at as a threat to society because persuasive speakers were able to sway people from distancing themselves from their beliefs. With this in mind, I think pathos is the most powerful component of the three pillars because if you connect with the audience, they will engage in what you have to say and it is a lot more memorable with the support of logos.

After reading this article it opened my eyes to the true factors to presenting a great speech. Ethos, is what can define as reputation. Too be credible you need to be known as a person with good character as well as other things listed. Whatever the speech is about the emotion, the look as well as the tone need to represent it so the audience can feel it. Great Article. All 3 should always be in a speech if you want to make it good. I think that Pathos is first of all because we all have emotions and is a way we all connect to each other and express what we do and what we say.

If you have a connection with Pathos then the other 2 are easily going to follow. Ethos, Pathos, and logos This article clearly explains the pillars of public speaking, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. I really enjoyed reading it. In my opinion, all three are essential elements in public speaking; however, depending on different situations, they might differently take part.

The best way to determine which one of these factors outweighs the others is by analyzing the audience and kind of speech that is being delivered. For example, if the audience is composed of well educated and high ranked people, maybe ethos and logo come before the pathos; however, in other situations, for example talking for younger audience, the pathos outweigh the other two. It could be true that Logos is the most important one.

If we deliver message that makes sense and base on facts, automatically people will respect and believe us. Logos is also important on a logical basis, you want your speech to have factual evidence and for it to make sense.

All three together are a recipe for a great speech. All three together are a recipe for a great speech.. By reading this article, I have understood the importance of these three pillars of public speaking. Now I understood that why our professor focused on to know everyone in the class from day one. He was trying to increase Ethos of each student.

I also understood that we can improve Pathos and Logos individually but not Ethos. I believe that these three pillars of public speaking played a huge role in first presidential debate.

Depending on the speech pathos could be the most important pilliar of speech. Motivational speeches or speeches for entertainment certanly draw more from pathos. I agree that logos should be the most important of the three but its clear that popularity is more important, especially for the masses. Looking at the presidential election that it going on, credibility and facts are sidelined to everything else during their campaigns.

I think that a speech should have ethos and pathos to it. Without ethos or pathos there would be a harder time to connect to the speaker. Yes logos is important as well because the speech must make sense but I dont think that it is quite the important. I remember in my junior year of high school, we spent the whole year learning about incorporating ethos, logos and pathos into all of my English writing. Now I am in college, and learning about it in public speaking. I believe that a speech without ethos, logos and pathos, is not whatsoever an effective speech.

After reading the article I believe that all are a great way to get your point across and a great way to be heard. But like the scenario above with the 9th grader versus the CEO you do not necessarily have to have all three to be a reliable source.

There is a certain way to hold your self and a certain way of delivery that implies Ethos, If you can come out there with the kind of, lets call it swagger for want of a better term, if you come out there with the kind of swagger that makes you not arrogant but believable and put the force of your confidence behind that act, that is a truly powerful move and that will build your Ethos.

Logos, while important no doubt, I feel is less something to strive for and more of something that should be there before you speak publicly period. So all three pillars are connected and share the rewards and consequences.

Now if you have one you do not necessarily have them all but if you have one in one direction, negative or positive, it is much easier to continue to head in that direction with your audience, and if its negative, its much harder to dig your self out of that hole because we as audience members and listeners do not easily forgive or forget when it comes to rough speech making.

This is a useful article for our persuasive speech later on in the course. Now I know which part I need to focus on in order to deliver a good persuasive speech. I also think that all are very important. But pathos is more important then the others. By using the element of pathos you connect with your audience, they might even give you credibility. And because they gave you the credit, they believe that you are talking the truth and at the end they even think that your thoughts are logical.

That is how religion used as a political power and it is really persuasive for a majority of people. It seems to me like these three pillars are like a three legged stool. If you lose one of them it gets incredibly hard not fall down. As a result, a truly great speech will have all three pillars to some degree. However, I notice that in most speeches a speaker will rely on one or two more than the others. Although the others are present in the speech, the take a back seat to one or two of the other pillars.

It is difficult to say which of these pillars is most important. I think it depends on who your audience is to a large degree. However, if I had to pick, I would have to say that pathos seems the most important.

Entire countries have been called to war based on emotional appeal. This is a loose argument, though, as all of the pillars are vital to a good speech. This was a thought provoking article and it will make me think about how I construct my speeches. I feel that this article is very true. You want people to be entertain and learn something with what you have to say.

Aristotle then identifies the three canonical modes of artistic proof: ethos, pathos and logos on grounds that, in order to persuade, one must exude good character, move the audience by appealing to emotions, and, of course, advance good reasons. Aristotle further asserts that a trustworthy character is one of the requisites of persuading because persons are more readily persuaded by those whom they trust.

Aristotle discusses this tripartite division in terms of the techne of rhetoric. However, a good deal more can be said about the relation of phronesis to rhetoric. The appeal to passion.